Go Back   XmodSource.com > Miscellaneous > Off-Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery iTrader Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-14-2008, 09:34 PM
BART's Avatar
BART BART is offline
XMS Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,621
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texan_idiot25 View Post
Not the same concept, because in practice eventually the thrust of the real plane can make the the plane pull off the treadmill. In the question above the treadmill spins in sync with the speeds of the plane's engines. In otherwords, faster the engine, faster the treadmill
Yet the planes "airspeed" has nothing to do with the speed of the treadmill.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-14-2008, 10:14 PM
KITT222's Avatar
KITT222 KITT222 is offline
Bored...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South of the Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 502
Trader Rating: (7)
Default

look, im going by "the plane wont move if its on the treadmill" taking off has nothing to with it. besides, this is a crappy plane. the basic idea is the same.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-14-2008, 10:46 PM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

i love chaos...
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-15-2008, 12:24 AM
urownstupidity's Avatar
urownstupidity urownstupidity is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 117
Trader Rating: (2)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZX9RBART View Post
It does not matter how fast the turbine spins nor how fast the conveyor goes, the speed of the plane compared to the conveyor is irrelevant. The speed of the plane in relation to the ground (and therefore the air) never changes and the plane will never lift off. No increased airflow across the wings...no flight.

Edit; now wheres my cookie!
i agree the back flaps on the wings are what make it lift off the ground..and if theres no wind to push them then how could it take off....now i think if you take a huge fan and then try this it might just work ahaha
__________________
IF XMODS WERE DRUGS I WOULD OVERDOSE
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-15-2008, 03:44 PM
kendallcschm's Avatar
kendallcschm kendallcschm is offline
the torqueinator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 807
Trader Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to kendallcschm
Default

its simple.... if the tread mill and nose of the plane are faceing in the same direction then the plane wont take off but if the plane is not parallel to the treadmill then it will take off... or if the engines get up enough power and at full throttle they might be able to get the plane to lift off depending on the speed of the treadmill.... too many variables....
__________________
New project:

'65 Drag Mustang

mods to be made:
pro street rims
some sort of suspension upgrade (message me if you have suggestions)
soft drag slicks

Titan:

mods to be made:
CF driveshaft
composite driveshaft gears
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-15-2008, 09:33 PM
fiberworkz's Avatar
fiberworkz fiberworkz is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 139
Trader Rating: (4)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendallcschm View Post
its simple.... if the tread mill and nose of the plane are faceing in the same direction then the plane wont take off but if the plane is not parallel to the treadmill then it will take off... or if the engines get up enough power and at full throttle they might be able to get the plane to lift off depending on the speed of the treadmill.... too many variables....
There are no variables. The treadmill can be spinning at any speed and it will still have absolutely no bearing on whether the airplane will take off or not. The plane will take off just like it would under normal conditions, the only difference will be the speed at which the tires turn.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:46 AM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

The turbine would move the same amount of air, whether the plane is on a treadmill or not. The lateral movement of the plane would be hampered, but it would take off just the same (air still moves over the wing despite the treadmill, providing lift). Basically this would be a viable method for shortening runways for take off, landing would still need a lengthy runway though. :-)
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-16-2008, 12:24 PM
KITT222's Avatar
KITT222 KITT222 is offline
Bored...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South of the Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 502
Trader Rating: (7)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imstock View Post
The turbine would move the same amount of air, whether the plane is on a treadmill or not. The lateral movement of the plane would be hampered, but it would take off just the same (air still moves over the wing despite the treadmill, providing lift). Basically this would be a viable method for shortening runways for take off, landing would still need a lengthy runway though. :-)
it wouldnt shorten them.. everything would be the same except for wheel's speed.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-16-2008, 06:53 PM
meme405 meme405 is offline
Xmod Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,004
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KITT222 View Post
it wouldnt shorten them.. everything would be the same except for wheel's speed.
HUH???

If the plane stays stationary on a 35m treadmill i believe thats shorter than the what, 1km runways we have now...

The plane takes off just the same...
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-16-2008, 07:53 PM
theoriganalRiD3R1967's Avatar
theoriganalRiD3R1967 theoriganalRiD3R1967 is offline
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 736
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imstock View Post
(air still moves over the wing despite the treadmill, providing lift)
what makes the air move (in relation to the wing), and i thought air must be under the wing, am i wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-16-2008, 09:34 PM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KITT222 View Post
it wouldnt shorten them.. everything would be the same except for wheel's speed.
If an airplane gains 3 tons of lift within a 10,000 runway, then it will create the same amount of lift on a >100 foot runway if the speed of the pavement matched the forward momentum of the plane.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theoriganalRiD3R1967 View Post
what makes the air move (in relation to the wing), and i thought air must be under the wing, am i wrong?
Air moves faster under the wing then above which creates lift.
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-17-2008, 08:03 PM
BART's Avatar
BART BART is offline
XMS Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,621
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imstock View Post
If an airplane gains 3 tons of lift within a 10,000 runway, then it will create the same amount of lift on a >100 foot runway if the speed of the pavement matched the forward momentum of the plane.



Air moves faster under the wing then above which creates lift.
So are you trying to say that the movement of the ground will change the airflow? Not in any noticeable manner as proved by simple physics. The earth is spinning at over 1000 mph, so why woulnt take off distances be different from east to west? The treadmill or moving runway would have no effect other than that which would be lost through frictional increases at the wheel.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-18-2008, 12:15 AM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZX9RBART View Post
So are you trying to say that the movement of the ground will change the airflow? Not in any noticeable manner as proved by simple physics. The earth is spinning at over 1000 mph, so why woulnt take off distances be different from east to west? The treadmill or moving runway would have no effect other than that which would be lost through frictional increases at the wheel.
Simple physics. If the force created by the prop generates 10mph forward movement, and the treadmill is rotating at 10mph, the lift needed would be obtained while the plane was stationary on the rotating treadmill. Dont get confused by forward momentum and lift, they have nothing to do with one another. Easy way to understand this is to watch the experiment done using scale aircraft. You can essentially reduce the area needed for take off down to a few feet (scaled).
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-18-2008, 12:25 AM
BART's Avatar
BART BART is offline
XMS Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,621
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imstock View Post
Simple physics. If the force created by the prop generates 10mph forward movement, and the treadmill is rotating at 10mph, the lift needed would be obtained while the plane was stationary on the rotating treadmill. Dont get confused by forward momentum and lift, they have nothing to do with one another. Easy way to understand this is to watch the experiment done using scale aircraft. You can essentially reduce the area needed for take off down to a few feet (scaled).
The 10 mph is ground speed measured on the treadmill, the airspeed over the wings at this point is 0. the plane will not fly without air passing over (and under) the wings. The treadmill creates no air to flow across the wings hence not increasing nor decreasing takeoff distance (disregarding frictional losses at the wheels)
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-18-2008, 01:01 AM
BART's Avatar
BART BART is offline
XMS Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,621
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Man up. Argue or defeat?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-18-2008, 09:02 AM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...rch_type=&aq=f
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-18-2008, 10:07 AM
BART's Avatar
BART BART is offline
XMS Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,621
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imstock View Post
We have established that it will take off but the distance the plane had to travel to reach liftoff did not change.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-18-2008, 06:41 PM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

If it gains zero forward momentum on the treadmill, the distance it travels before take off is zero which is a lot less then it takes the average plane on a standard runway.
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-18-2008, 07:26 PM
BART's Avatar
BART BART is offline
XMS Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,621
Trader Rating: (5)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imstock View Post
If it gains zero forward momentum on the treadmill, the distance it travels before take off is zero which is a lot less then it takes the average plane on a standard runway.
Why would it gain 0 forward momentum on the treadmill??? Even in the video it shows the plane moving forward. The plane has to travel through the "air" at a certain speed in order to have enough lift to take off. The speed the treadmill is moving underneath is completely irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-18-2008, 09:06 PM
imstock's Avatar
imstock imstock is offline
Advance member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 167
Trader Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to imstock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZX9RBART View Post
Why would it gain 0 forward momentum on the treadmill??? Even in the video it shows the plane moving forward. The plane has to travel through the "air" at a certain speed in order to have enough lift to take off. The speed the treadmill is moving underneath is completely irrelevant.
The question states the the treadmill moves in the opposite direction at the same rate of speed at the which the planes moves forward. This keeps the plane from moving forward. The plane can obtain lift because the prop is directing air over the wings. If you don't believe me look it up yourself, there's no debating it.
__________________
Project GENi under way...

16.8 in the quarter mile isn't fast.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.